Two different bribes for your action. Bet105 sells reduced juice on every bet. Rainbet sells a flat 10% weekly rakeback with no strings. Which one actually pays more depends entirely on how you bet.
| Category | Bet105 | Rainbet |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 8.4/10 | 7.3/10 |
| Type | crypto sportsbook | crypto casino with sportsbook |
| Licence | Curacao eGaming | Anjouan Gaming Authority, licence ALSI-152406029-FI2 |
| Withdrawal speed | Under 10 minutes for BTC, up to 1 hour for other coins | ~5 minutes average, before network confirmation. USDT-TRC20 and USDC-Solana clear inside 1 minute. |
| Welcome offer | $50 free bet on your first $100 deposit | 250% bonus across first three deposits, plus 60 free spins on Sweet Bonanza. 40x |
| Sports covered | 11 | 6 |
| VIP / rakeback | No public tiered programme. High-volume players get direct account manager acces | Auto-enrolled 24-tier ladder. 10% weekly rakeback at every tier, claimable on-de |
| Limit-hunting history | None documented. Marketing openly states 'winners welcome' and we have not found | Documented on the sportsbook. Bitcointalk complaint (Valorant grand finals) desc |
Reduced juice only pays off if you're betting sportsbook markets regularly. Rakeback pays back a percentage of what you wager regardless of whether you win, which matters more to casino-heavy players. Bet105 has no documented limit-hunting history. Rainbet does, specifically a Valorant grand-finals dispute where limits were cut to $0.05 after bets were voided. Bet105 also runs a Curacao eGaming licence versus Rainbet's Anjouan licence, which most industry commentary treats as the weaker of the two on player recourse.
If you bet sportsbook markets and want the tightest possible pricing with no limit-hunting risk, Bet105 is the stronger pick and it's our top-rated crypto sportsbook for exactly that reason. If you're a high-volume casino player who wants a straightforward percentage back regardless of win or loss, Rainbet's rakeback model is the more generous mechanic on paper, weighed against a considerably murkier regulatory picture.